Tokenisation (RWA)
Tokenisation and the EU legal framework
There is no single EU regime covering all tokenised assets. Instead, a token falls under one of the existing frameworks depending on what it represents. That qualification determines which licence an issuer needs, which disclosure duties apply and which supervisor has authority.
MiCA: the framework for crypto-assets without security features
The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) covers crypto-assets that do not qualify as financial instruments under MiFID. This includes utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens such as stablecoins. MiCA imposes requirements around a whitepaper, capital, governance and market abuse for these categories.
A tokenised product that purely grants access to a service, or a stablecoin backed by a reserve pool, generally falls under MiCA. Once a token grants a return or profit right resembling an investment, the qualification shifts towards securities law and MiCA drops out, since the regulation explicitly excludes financial instruments.
- MiCA covers utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens
- Financial instruments are explicitly excluded from MiCA
- Whitepaper and governance duties are separate from securities rules
When a token qualifies as a security under MiFID
A token representing a share, bond or fund participation generally qualifies as a financial instrument under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II). What matters is not the technical form but the economic substance: if the token grants a profit right, voting right or a claim on underlying assets comparable to a classic security, existing securities rules apply in full.
That means an issuer of a tokenised share or bond fund may need to publish a prospectus, trading venues handling the token may need an investment firm licence, and the usual transparency and market abuse rules apply. The blockchain changes nothing about the underlying legal qualification; it is merely the recording mechanism.
- Economic substance drives the qualification, not the technology
- A profit right or claim on underlying assets points to a security
- Prospectus and licensing duties remain fully applicable
The DLT Pilot Regime as a testing environment
Because existing securities rules assume central custodians and classic settlement systems, the EU introduced a temporary experimental framework: the DLT Pilot Regime. It allows market infrastructures to trade and settle securities on distributed ledger technology under relaxed conditions, provided certain size thresholds are not exceeded.
The regime applies to multilateral trading facilities and securities settlement systems that receive specific permission from their supervisor to operate with DLT. It is deliberately temporary and limited in scale, intended to gather experience before any permanent legislation follows.
- Temporary exemption from certain classic infrastructure rules
- Only accessible to specifically licensed trading and settlement platforms
- Size thresholds cap how much can run through the regime
Practical consequences for issuers and investors
For an issuer, the legal analysis has to happen upfront, not afterwards: first determine whether the product is a security, and only then choose the technical setup. Misclassified tokens can trigger a halt on further issuance or redemption obligations.
For investors, it is useful to identify which regime a token falls under in the offer documents, since this determines which protection applies. A MiCA token offers different guarantees than a security token under full MiFID protection.
- Classification happens before the technical issuance
- Misclassification can lead to enforcement by the supervisor
- Protection level differs sharply between MiCA and security tokens
Frequently asked questions
Do all tokens fall under MiCA?
No. MiCA explicitly excludes financial instruments. A token representing a share, bond or fund participation falls under existing securities law, not MiCA.
What is the difference between MiCA and the DLT Pilot Regime?
MiCA covers crypto-assets without security features. The DLT Pilot Regime is a temporary experimental framework letting licensed infrastructures trade and settle securities on blockchain.
Who decides whether a token is a security?
The final assessment rests with the national supervisor, based on the product's economic features. The token's technical form is not decisive.
Can a token fall under multiple regimes at once?
Not simultaneously for the same qualification in practice: a token is either a financial instrument under MiFID or a crypto-asset under MiCA. Adjacent rules, such as anti-money-laundering law, can always apply alongside.
Read next
Custody and settlement of tokenised assets
How do custody, delivery-versus-payment and the role of CSDs and banks work in the safekeeping and settlement of tokenised securities?
Tokenisation in Belgium and the Netherlands
How do the FSMA and AFM approach tokenisation, what tax points matter, and how far has the market progressed in Belgium and the Netherlands?
Tokenised treasuries and money market funds
How tokenised treasuries and money market funds work, how the yield is generated and which risks remain despite the blockchain layer.